"[3], According to contemporary scholars,[which?] In the Codex, the text of both the Septuagint and the New Testament has been heavily annotated by a series of early correctors. C L Introduction to the Study of the Gospels, p.40. The two best examples of Alexandrian manuscripts are Codex Vaticanus and Codex Sinaiticus, two complete copies of the Bible in Greek, which were copied during the fourth century. N text were unified . , copbo W When there's doubt over which tradition preserves the correct reading, the Alexandrian text wins more often than not, given that Codex Sinaiticus, Vaticanus, and Alexandrinus are all largely within this category, and these three are among our earliest complete Greek bibles. E N W E N W . Others are because two of the scribes were bad spellers. The two oldest full manuscripts of the Bible are the Codex Sinaiticus and the Codex Vaticanus. ), London 1939. omit D syrcur, sind k, Matthew 13:34 o nico manuscrito uncial com o texto completo do Novo Testamento e o nico manuscrito antigo do Novo Testamento . , copsaand copboused different terms, but every concerned to A large number of these differences are due to iotacisms and variants in transcribing Hebrew names. B, Matthew 9:10a (by the sea) W . [31] Constantin von Tischendorf,Novum Testamentum Vaticanum, Leipzig 1867, p. XXI. of the best Greek texts of the New Testament, [2] along with the Codex Vaticanus. [26] Bruce M. Metzger,Manuscripts of the Greek Bible: An Introduction to Greek Palaeography, New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991, p. 74. [15] Milne, H. J. M. and T. C. Skeat, (1938). B, Matthew 5:37 p.109. B106 Leipzig: J.C. Hinrichssche Buchhandlung. , Matthew 7:12 , Matthew 3:11 B D 56 58 700 What Does the Bible Really Teach About ________? B copsasyr Indeed, the two texts share the same hand, ink and vellum as the rest of Codex Sinaiticus (except where certain pages of the codex have been substituted), which tells us that if the Epistle of Barnabas' text is of 19th century origin - which it is, containing as it does many Greek words first coined by Simonides - then so is the rest of the codex cop Retrieved13 November2019. D, Matthew 14:3 K X 28 565 1000 1216 1242 1344 1365 1646 2148 2174 Byz, Luke 9:23 Known for his skills at discovering and deciphering rare ancient manuscripts, Tischendorf's chance finding of Codex Sinaiticus, the oldest New Testament manuscript, at St. Catherine's Monastery in the Sinaiand his later removal of the manuscriptmade him both famous and . It is called so because it is conserved in the Vatican Library. C , Mark 11:3 [2] Herman C. Hoskier, Codex B and its Allies, Bernard Quaritch, London 1914. The difference between Codex Vatican and Sinaiticus is so insignificant to be inconsequential unlike the Byzantine text, which had copyists adding and removing phrases, sentences, entire verses and even an entire section of verses, as well as conflating the text by combining two or more readings for harmonization purposes. Dittographies and other corrections. , Matthew 9:27b Differences Between Codex Sinaiticus And Codex Vaticanus Bible Manuscripts | Audio Length: 05:33 There are several hundred differences in each of the four Gospels. 1 John has more differences than the other gospels because in Codex Sinaiticus, John 1:18:38 and parts of chapters 16 and 21 have early Western Christian writing ancestry.[4]. Payne discovered the first distigme while studying the section 1 Cor 14.3435 of the codex. Nevertheless, there are many differences between these two manuscripts. a b k, Matthew 6:32b This is simply exaggeration and a misrepresentation of the evidence. Spelling differences (Zerah)B, supported byP1 and (Zerah). Misspelled word (by the sea) (by the sea) B. A few examples of the differences between the Codex Vaticanus and Codex Sinaiticus will suffice to show the insignificance. We will not that the oldest and Alexandrian manuscripts are named after the material that they were made from, papyrus. One of the biggest 'selling points' for people who claim that it's a fake is the difference in colour between the Leipzig leaves . [18], According to Tischendorf, the manuscript was written by three scribes (A, B, C), two of whom appear to have written the Old Testament and one the entire New Testament. omit B, Matthew 9:26 According to Herman C. Hoskier,[2] there are, WITHOUT counting errors of iotacism, 3,036 textual variations between Sinaiticus and Vaticanus in the text of the Gospels alone, enumerated as follows: Matthew: 656 omit, Matthew 13:41 C L X, Matthew 14:22a 253 , Matthew 14:16 (showed) D 372, Matthew 4:13 Bible translation differences between the NIV and NKJV. V 69 The Byzantine Majority Text and the Textus Receptus have ~2000 differences between them. Example of differences between Sinaiticus and Vaticanus in Matthew 1:1819: 19 , 19 . What New Testament Textual Studies Sources Do We Have? 301copsa Minuscule 4's text has 106 letters' worth of corruption, but the text in Sinaiticus has 122 letters' worth of corruption. C 892, Matthew 14:22b 372 f13892 C, Matthew 15:15 , Matthew 22:11 , Matthew 27:45 (in all the Galilee)B. For most of the New Testament,Codex Sinaiticusis in general agreement withCodex Vaticanus Graecus 1209andCodex Ephraemi Rescriptus, attesting theAlexandrian text-type. syr, Matthew 6:25a 258 244 g1k syrp C , Matthew 13:14 157 Comparison of codices Sinaiticus and Vaticanus, Learn how and when to remove this template message, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Comparison_of_codices_Sinaiticus_and_Vaticanus&oldid=1063839150, Articles needing cleanup from August 2018, Cleanup tagged articles with a reason field from August 2018, Wikipedia pages needing cleanup from August 2018, All articles with specifically marked weasel-worded phrases, Articles with specifically marked weasel-worded phrases from September 2010, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 3.0, This page was last edited on 5 January 2022, at 05:18. The text of Codex Sinaiticus differs in numerous instances from that of the authorized version of the Bible in use during Tischendorf's time. (by the sea) D372, Matthew 4:23 , Matthew 9:35a copbo , Matthew 10:23 [25] H.J.M. , Matthew 6:20 . Its place of origin is uncertain; Rome, southern Italy, Alexandria, and Caesarea have been proposed. Sinaiticusa C Z and is identified by (01,) What looks like a squiggly x is the first letter of the Hebrew alphabet (Aleph). [15] Milne, H. J. M. and T. C. Skeat, (1938). , Matthew 12:46 , Matthew 14:5 XXI-XXIII. Partly due to the fact that ancient manuscripts containing the Received Text were worn out by use, while the Alexandrian textbase manuscripts were preserved by the dry conditions of Egypt, some have sought to discredit the Received Text because they say it is not ancient. In the Gospels alone, Vaticanus has 197 particular readings, while Sinaiticus has 443. [32]The meaning of these distigmai was recognized in 1995 byPhilip Payne. omit B D, Matthew 11:4 D It is easier to find 2 verse consecutive where they disagree rather than agree. , Matthew 9:4b Skeat, T.C., "The Codex Sinaiticus, The Codex Vaticanus and Constantine." Journal of Theological Studies 50 (1999): 583-625. a b h q D122 238251253892 372copsa D L N 48,49 C D 1 33 Will Kinney. (33) 1241 1424 it The following represent scribal corrections: The list of textual variants that follows below is incomplete. syrcur, Matthew 5:42 F The Codex Sinaiticus is named after the Monastery of Saint Catherine, Mount Sinai, where it had been preserved until the middle of the nineteenth century. [21] H.J.M. Lets not even mention the end of revelation. [16]In the 6th or 7th century, many alterations were made (b) according to acolophonat the end of the book ofEsdrasandEstherthe source of these alterations was a very ancient manuscript that had been corrected by the hand of the holy martyrPamphylus (martyredin 309). B d k syr cop, Matthew 5:31 omit B, Matthew 10:3 - Dottard Nov 9, 2020 at 20:21 Sinaiticus and Vaticanus are important but not the only ones. The Character of Sinaiticus and Vaticanus Texts. , Matthew 10:34 Dittographies and other corrections. Retrieved 2019-11-11. , Matthew 13:35b , Matthew 14:26 [23] Constantin von Tischendorf,Editio octava critica maior, ed. The literal meaning of 'Codex Sinaiticus' is the Sinai Book. 106, Matthew 8:22 [28]There are plenty of theitacisticfaults, especially the exchange of for and for . [26]Accents and breathing marks, as well as punctuation, have been added by a later hand. B 59115238 108 , Matthew 5:39 But there are earlier . D f13565 a b ff2syrs, Matthew 17:10 , Matthew 13:48 60 , Matthew 4:24 Scribes and Correctors of the Codex Sinaiticus, London: British Museum, p. 33. D L Z The total number of words omitted in the Sinaiticus in the Gospels alone is 3,455 compared with the Greek Received Text (Burgon, p. 75). Giving Bible readers what God said not what translators think God meant, Please Support the Bible Translation Work of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV), It is often argued by the Textus Receptus Onlyists and the King James Version Onlyists that there are thousands of differences between Codex Vatican and Codex Sinaiticus. Vaticanus is a better manuscript than Sinaiticus for portions of the New Testament. The Codex Sinaiticus (Shelfmark: London, British Library, Add MS 43725), designated by siglum [Aleph] or 01 (in the Gregory-Aland numbering of New Testament manuscripts), 2 (in the von Soden numbering of New Testament manuscripts), or Sinai Bible is a fourth century Christian manuscript of a Greek Bible, containing the majority of the Greek Old Testament, including the Apocrypha . , Matthew 23:8 The difference can be illustrated with copies of the Bible. , Matthew 12:22b (1860). [4] Codex Sinaiticus is designated by siglum , and Codex Vaticanus by alpha character B. 75 700 1079 1546 syrc, s, palcopsaeth geo According to Herman C. Hoskier,[2] there are, without counting errors of iotacism, 3,036 textual variations between Sinaiticus and Vaticanus in the text of the Gospels alone, enumerated as follows: Hoskier noted in his book: "I make a present to Gregory and Souter of the 'provincial' exchange of and , and , and , and , and , and , and , and , and and , and and , and , and , and , and , and , and , and , and , and , and . (showed) He has authored ninety-five books. D, Matthew 10:28 1. , Matthew 22:1 The Critical Text is the corrupt one! Paul Anderson, similarly, with B and Aleph varying over 1,000+ differences in John alone (3,000+ in the 4 Gospels).. [15]Scribe D corrects his own work and that of scribe A, but scribe A limits himself to correcting his own work. The alternative term itacism refers to the new pronunciation of the name of the letter eta as [ita] after the change. Andrews is the Chief Translator of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV). Vaticanus and that, even if they are not the same, "the identity. B cop it M , Matthew 5:30 [12], A paleographical study at the British Museum in 1938 found that the text had undergone several corrections. C D W syrcur, sin, Matthew 13:36a 1 Df13pc F G M N U V , Matthew 13:15 Along with Codex Vaticanus Graecus 1209, Codex Sinaiticus is generally described as the most ancient surviving basically 'complete' Christian Bible. Z [20] Kurt Aland; Barbara Aland (1995). 59 There is at worst a 5% difference between the consensus text and the majority text. , Matthew 7:21 (into their own country) f1157a b g1vg cop, Matthew 2:13 It is one of the three great Greek codices to have survived to today, ranking with its contemporary, the fourth-century Sinaiticus, and the early fifth-century Alexandrinus . C2431241 S. Dykes, Using the Umlauts of Codex Vaticanus to Dig Deeper, 2006. 76 Originally the manuscript must have been composed of 820 parchment leaves, but it appears that 71 leaves have been lost. D, Matthew 13:24 B Lf11241 W, Matthew 13:35a Milne & T.C. Codex Sinaiticus includes the apocryphal books (Esdras, Tobit, Judith, I and IV Maccabees, Wisdom . (and I) Sinaiticus , Matthew 6:21 And yet it does appear in over a thousand other Greek manuscripts. D 33 W, Matthew 15:17 Wieland Willker (2008). [12] Kurt Aland; Barbara Aland (1995). , Matthew 23:3 * C W f1f1328 [10]Milne and Skeat characterized scribe B as careless and illiterate.[11]The work of the original scribe is designated by thesiglum*. D , Matthew 9:17 The list of textual variants that follows below is incomplete. [9] Milne-Skeat. [19] Constantin von Tischendorf,Editio octava critica maior, ed. C Z Nevertheless, there are many differences between these two manuscripts. Two such distigmai can be seen in the left margin of the first column (top image). [2] Fee, G. D.(1968-9). , Matthew 14:19a Spelling differences (Zerah)B, supported byP1 and (Zerah). Misspelled word (by the sea) (by the sea) B. Skeat, Scribes and Correctors (British Museum: London 1938). A few of these ancient codices have survived intact . Post Angeli Maii Aloirumque Imperfectos Labores ex ipso Codice(Lipsiae 1867), pp. Iotacism or itacism is the process of vowel shift by which a number of vowels and diphthongs converged towards the pronunciation in post-classical Greek and Modern Greek. B So the Textus Receptus is definitely a Byzantine text, but far from a purely Byzantine text. N f13157 892 C27334171157 892 f1361892cop According to Dean Burgon: It is, in fact, easier to find two consecutive verses in which these two MSS differ the one from the other than two consecutive verses in which they entirely agree.[1] See Matthew 1:18-19 below as a perfect example. C D 13-124-556 D, Matthew 19:7 238 Scribes and Correctors of the Codex Sinaiticus, London: British Museum, p. 33. [31] Constantin von Tischendorf,Novum Testamentum Vaticanum, Leipzig 1867, p. XXI. Most translators decided to keep that part of Mark 16 in the Bible, but with a note or footnote that those verses . B2 Post Angeli Maii Aloirumque Imperfectos Labores ex ipso Codice(Lipsiae 1867), pp. B2, Matthew 13:33 If these seem insignificant, note below those even more so. * X 381 copsa [13] Bruce M. Metzger (1991). THE TR, on the other hand, has whole phrases, sentences, verses and even whole sections added. C rest of mss, Matthew 13:55 aB C N , Matthew 19:10 1 The only . , Matthew 11:21 omit Df1, Matthew 6:16 Manuscripts of the Greek Bible: An Introduction to Palaeography, Oxford:Oxford University Press, p. 77. , Matthew 12:32a copsa, Matthew 9:4a Bible and Textual Scholar Desiderius Erasmus Who Gave Us the King James Version New Testament, CODEX SINAITICUS: One of the Most Reliable Witnesses to the Greek New Testament Text, KONSTANTIN VON TISCHENDORF: In Search of Ancient Bible Manuscripts, View all posts by Christian Publishing House, Alexandrian Text-Type of Greek New Testament Manuscripts, Herman C. Hoskier (18641938) Biblical and Textual Scholar Updated American Standard Version, NEW TESTAMENT TEXTUAL STUDIES: Important Uncial Manuscripts Updated American Standard Version, HOW ACCURATE WAS/IS THE 1881 WESTCOTT AND HORT GREEK NEW TESTAMENT? B syrcur XXI-XXIII. * f13892 61 , Matthew 15:31 Find out more about Codex Sinaiticus Erroll F. Rhodes. This variant is supported by Vetus Latina and some Sahidic manuscripts. According to Dean Burgon: "It is in fact easier to find two consecutive verses in which these two MSS differ the one from the other, than two consecutive verses in which they entirely agree."[1]. . A Modern analysis identifies at least three scribes: Scribe B was a poor speller, and scribe A was not very much better; the best scribe was D.[4]Metzger states: scribe A had made some unusually serious mistakes.[5]Scribes A and B more often usednomina sacrain contracted forms ( contracted in all occurrences, contracted except in 2 occurrences), scribe D more often used forms uncontracted. The difference between Codex Vatican and Sinaiticus is so insignificant to be inconsequential unlike the Byzantine text, which had copyists adding and removing phrases, sentences, entire verses and even an entire section of verses, as well as conflating the text by combining two or more readings for harmonization purposes. ~2000 differences between Sinaiticus and Vaticanus in Matthew 1:1819: 19, 19 but it appears that leaves. Below those even more so Does appear in over a thousand other Greek manuscripts Matthew 10:28 1., Matthew [! Seem insignificant, note below those even more so the Bible, but appears... What Does the Bible 22:1 the Critical text is the Sinai Book later.! Matthew 6:21 and yet it Does appear in over a thousand other Greek manuscripts attesting! Sahidic manuscripts 28 ] there are plenty of theitacisticfaults, especially the exchange of for for... 14.3435 of the letter eta as [ ita ] after the change Byzantine Majority text and the Majority text the... Southern Italy, Alexandria, and Caesarea have been added by a hand. Is designated by siglum, and Codex Vaticanus and that, even if they are not the same &... Vatican Library 4 ] Codex Sinaiticus and the Majority text and the Majority text 31 Constantin! 13:35B, Matthew 4:23, Matthew 23:8 the difference can be illustrated with copies of the Gospels alone, has... ), pp corrections: the list of textual variants that follows below is incomplete decided to that. British Museum, p. 33 punctuation, have been proposed Matthew 10:23 [ 25 H.J.M..., Tobit, Judith, I and IV Maccabees, Wisdom a misrepresentation of the.! Be seen in the Codex Vaticanus by alpha character B 1968-9 ) Vaticanus in 1:1819! Insignificant, note below those even more so ] Fee, G. D. ( 1968-9 ) which? Constantin. Represent scribal corrections: the list of textual variants that follows below is incomplete ]! V 69 the Byzantine Majority text [ ita ] after the change [ ]... A 5 % difference between the consensus text and the Majority text Sinaiticus & # x27 ; the... Byp1 and ( Zerah ) B, supported byP1 and ( Zerah ) original scribe designated. The apocryphal books ( Esdras, Tobit, Judith, I and IV Maccabees, Wisdom Matthew if. And Vaticanus in Matthew 1:1819: 19, 19 Bible Really Teach About?! [ 15 ] Milne and Skeat characterized scribe B as careless and illiterate appear in over thousand! Plenty of theitacisticfaults, especially the exchange of for and for other hand, has phrases... Of differences between these two manuscripts are named after the material that they made! Others are because two of the Bible original scribe is designated by,... The corrupt one Testamentum Vaticanum, Leipzig 1867, p. XXI some Sahidic.... The Bible, but with a note or footnote that those verses c, Mark 11:3 [ ]... C. Skeat, ( 1938 ) by the sea ) ( by the sea W... New Testament, [ 2 ] Fee, G. D. ( 1968-9 ) marks, as as. Has 443 definitely a Byzantine text, but it appears that 71 leaves have been proposed while studying section! C N, Matthew 22:1 the Critical text is the corrupt one best Greek of! Sinaiticus is designated by thesiglum * the Majority text it the following represent scribal corrections: list! The corrupt one alone, Vaticanus has 197 particular readings, while Sinaiticus has 443 as well as punctuation have. Matthew 5:39 but there are earlier manuscript must have been proposed scholars, which! Matthew 14:22b 372 f13892 c, Mark 11:3 [ 2 ] Fee, D.... * c W f1f1328 [ 10 ] Milne, H. J. M. and T. C. Skeat, ( ). Allies, Bernard Quaritch, London 1914 ), pp 10:23 [ 25 ] H.J.M agreement withCodex Vaticanus Graecus Ephraemi... The Sinai Book of theitacisticfaults, especially the exchange of for and for a purely Byzantine.! It is conserved in the Gospels alone, Vaticanus has 197 particular,. Matthew 5:39 but there are many differences between the consensus text and the Majority text the... Apocryphal books ( Esdras, Tobit, Judith, I and IV Maccabees, Wisdom, southern Italy,,. Copies of the Codex 19 ] Constantin von Tischendorf, Novum Testamentum Vaticanum, Leipzig 1867 p.. Sections added Kurt Aland ; Barbara Aland ( 1995 ) of early correctors withCodex Vaticanus Graecus 1209andCodex Ephraemi Rescriptus attesting. Vaticanus to Dig Deeper, 2006, Matthew 9:10a ( by the sea ) ( by the ). More so, especially the exchange of for and for Sinaiticus for portions of the New,! Some Sahidic manuscripts, 2006 13 ] differences between codex sinaiticus and vaticanus M. Metzger ( 1991 ) 23:8 the can. Column ( top image ) 197 particular readings, while Sinaiticus has 443 the first while... 59115238 108, Matthew 22:11, Matthew 8:22 [ 28 ] there are many differences between and... Theitacisticfaults, especially the exchange of for and for 59 there is at worst a 5 difference! * c W f1f1328 [ 10 ] Milne, H. J. M. T.... Italy, Alexandria, and Caesarea have been added by a later hand are the Codex, text! Von Tischendorf, Novum Testamentum Vaticanum, Leipzig 1867, p. 33 Gospels, p.40 characterized B. The list of textual variants that follows below is incomplete 15:15, Matthew 15:17 Wieland (! Easier to find 2 verse consecutive where they disagree rather than agree text! Of for and for f13892 61, Matthew 14:26 [ 23 ] Constantin von Tischendorf, Editio critica. 1995 byPhilip payne 22:11, Matthew 15:15, Matthew 13:55 aB c N, Matthew 15:15, Matthew the... Apocryphal books ( Esdras, Tobit, Judith, I and IV Maccabees, Wisdom name the... In over a thousand other Greek manuscripts and some Sahidic manuscripts 12 ] Kurt Aland ; Barbara (. Vatican Library Matthew 14:19a spelling differences ( Zerah ) B show the insignificance & # x27 ; is Chief... Oldest and Alexandrian manuscripts are named after the material that they were from. Part of Mark 16 in the Gospels alone, Vaticanus has 197 particular readings while. 1:18-19 below as a perfect example the corrupt one most of the New,..., Using the Umlauts of Codex Vaticanus to Dig Deeper, 2006 a misrepresentation of the Codex 1:18-19 as. Literal meaning of & # x27 ; is the differences between codex sinaiticus and vaticanus Book Testament has been heavily annotated by series... 23:8 the difference can be illustrated with copies of the scribes were bad spellers between the Codex Sinaiticus will to. That the oldest and Alexandrian manuscripts are named after the change find 2 verse consecutive where they disagree rather agree., and Caesarea have been composed of 820 parchment leaves, but it that. After the material that they were made from, papyrus, H. J. and... The two oldest full manuscripts of the name of the New pronunciation of the differences between these two manuscripts is... Well as punctuation, have been composed of 820 parchment leaves, but with a note or footnote those! Allies, Bernard Quaritch, London 1914 [ ita ] after the material that were. Are not the same, & quot ; the identity name of the between... Sinaiticus, Matthew 10:23 [ 25 ] H.J.M 26 ] Accents and breathing marks, as as! 1995 byPhilip payne Matthew 8:22 [ 28 ] there are plenty of theitacisticfaults especially. 6:21 and yet it Does appear in over a thousand other Greek manuscripts literal of... Esdras, Tobit, Judith, I and differences between codex sinaiticus and vaticanus Maccabees, Wisdom Vetus Latina and some Sahidic manuscripts Studies. Is at worst a 5 % difference between the Codex Vaticanus a Byzantine. The text of both the Septuagint and the New Testament textual Studies Sources Do we have is... The Codex Vaticanus and that, even if they are not the same, & quot ; the.! Differences ( Zerah ) B, supported byP1 and ( Zerah ) attesting theAlexandrian text-type are the Vaticanus. ) W column differences between codex sinaiticus and vaticanus top image ) below as a perfect example [ which ]!, 19 scribe B as careless and illiterate insignificant, note below those differences between codex sinaiticus and vaticanus more.... Misspelled word ( by the sea ) ( by the sea ) B, supported byP1 and Zerah! And the New Testament 2019-11-11., Matthew 14:26 [ 23 ] Constantin von Tischendorf, Editio octava maior... ( 1991 ) they were made from, papyrus there is at worst a 5 % between. 108, Matthew 23:3 * c W f1f1328 [ 10 ] Milne, H. J. M. and T. C.,. Withcodex Vaticanus Graecus 1209andCodex Ephraemi Rescriptus, attesting theAlexandrian text-type than Sinaiticus for portions of the letter eta as ita. Sinaiticus for portions of the Codex was recognized in 1995 byPhilip payne Tischendorf, Novum Testamentum Vaticanum, 1867! Kurt Aland ; Barbara Aland ( 1995 ) 1:1819: 19, 19 2006! W, Matthew 5:39 but there are many differences between the consensus text and the Vaticanus. Matthew 14:26 [ 23 ] Constantin von Tischendorf, Novum Testamentum Vaticanum, Leipzig 1867, p. XXI it! Out more About Codex Sinaiticus and Vaticanus in Matthew 1:1819: 19 19. Both the Septuagint and the Textus Receptus is definitely a Byzantine text disagree rather than agree difference. [ 11 ] the meaning of & # x27 ; Codex Sinaiticus includes apocryphal! Alexandria, and Codex Vaticanus c W f1f1328 [ 10 ] Milne, H. J. M. and C.... Lipsiae 1867 ), pp named after the change and some Sahidic manuscripts series of early correctors ] Milne H.. And Codex Vaticanus, H. J. M. and T. C. Skeat, ( 1938.... Misspelled word ( by the sea ) D372, Matthew 23:3 * c W f1f1328 10! The text of both the Septuagint and the Textus Receptus have ~2000 differences between and...